Dissent

Judge Clarence Thomas Wrote a dissent he was the judge who didn’t vote with the majority. Judge Thomas believed that it was the job of the supervisors so show better judgment and charter on there end. He also believed that Suders didn’t have adequate time to respond to the right authorities and by her confiding the Equal Employment Opportunity Officer that should have equaled the same as her filing a sexual harassment claim. Judge Thomas made a good point but due to the company policies and procures that were not followed the majority voted for Pennsylvania State Police.